In September I saw my words in print for the very first time. The Princeton Alumni Weekly published an essay of mine called “A Foot In Two Worlds.” The essay explores one of my most fundamental and lingering fears, which is that by choosing to work part time and ‘stay home’ part time I’ve in fact done a poor job at both. By refusing to let go of either “world” I have failed at both. It is worth noting that I think the bifurcation between “home” and “work” is a bit antiquated, and that that categorization is simplistic and fails to capture what is in most cases a complex dance rather than a binary distinction. Still, the fact remains that I have chosen to work part-time in business settings since my children were born, and I’m full of doubts about this path.
My friend Lacy wrote me a thoughtful, provocative email yesterday responding to the essay, full of her classic sensitivity and intelligence. She posited that in fact the point I make isn’t about a choice at all but about being present and really surrendering to whichever experience I’m in at a given time. And I think she’s right. After all, I do say this:
I think it’s about my wiring, my frantic restlessness, the way I struggle to be fully engaged in one thing at a time.
I’ve been thinking about Lacy’s comments, and about the distress I feel about my work/home choices are maybe, in fact, a red herring. Maybe I just regret not really immersing myself in anything, fully, for the last many years.
This summer, being home full-time with Grace and Whit for the first time, was nothing short of a revelation. My part time schedule meant that I have always been able to do the random Tuesday afternoon birthday parties, and the doctor’s appointments, etc, but the day-in and day-out participation in the mundane details of my children’s lives was new. It was only when I capitulated to what I might have previously called monotony that the divinity revealed itself. And now, somehow, the details of this domestic life are newly bright to me.
I hope I can likewise find myself fully present and committed to a professional challenge. My new job, maybe, a book, maybe, who knows. I frankly ache to feel in the professional realm the same sort of deep peace, combined with a fundamental opening, that I’ve felt towards my life with my children.
I’ve heard from many readers of my Alumni Weekly piece, and am happy to know that others relate. I’m sorry, though, that the note that we seem to resonate on is one of malaise, of fundamental restlessness. I find myself wondering if this is not about the work/life balance mothers are aiming for, but instead about some profound truth about the human condition. Surely the challenges of working and mothering, of meeting the needs of myriad people, of trying to navigate the choppy waters of identity, personhood, and fulfillment contribute to this sense of frustration and unhappiness. But maybe they aren’t actually its fundamental source.
I don’t know – I am thinking through this as I write it. I sense something greater here, in the debate about work/life “balance,” a grander theme. The topic is fraught and complicated, for sure; Lacy called it “volcanic” and I agree with her. But the reason it’s so charged, I think, is because it probes at our innermost fears about how we are living our lives. These fears are projected onto the scrim of professional/personal choices, but I suspect they run even deeper than that. These fears are about the way we engage with the world and with those we love best, and about the way we spend our only true wealth: our time and our attention.